Cosmetic Market Entry in Vietnam — a Foreign-Company Guide
End-to-end reference for foreign cosmetic companies planning market entry to Vietnam — the ASEAN Cosmetic Notification pathway, who may hold the notification, dossier structure, timelines, fees, common rejection reasons, and the boundary between what a foreign company can do itself and what requires a Vietnamese partner. Not a registration-service brokerage — a reference guide plus free tools.
Overview
This page is written for the foreign cosmetic company evaluating Vietnam as a new market. It answers the practical questions that come up in the first planning conversations — before an appointed local partner is on retainer, before a country-of-origin certificate is legalised, and before the online notification portal is accessed. The intent is to give the foreign team an accurate mental model of what a Vietnamese cosmetic notification is, how the ASEAN framework maps onto Vietnamese national rules, and where the real friction lies.
What Medibase does and does not do:
- Medibase is a Regulatory Technology (RegTech) reference and tools platform. It does not act as a Local Responsible Company, does not file cosmetic notifications on behalf of a foreign brand, and does not act as a legal representative in Vietnam. Anyone pitching those services as "Medibase" is not affiliated with Medibase.
- Medibase does provide free tools that accelerate the diagnostic and planning stages: the Ingredient & Substance Checker (screens INCI names and CAS numbers against ASEAN Cosmetic Directive Annex II/III and the Vietnamese MoH prohibited-substance annexes carried forward under Circular 06/2011/TT-BYT), the Expiry / Renewal Calculator, and the Regulatory Impact Simulator wizard. All tools are on /tools/.
What Vietnamese cosmetic notification is: Vietnam operates the ASEAN Cosmetic Notification (ACN) framework, meaning cosmetics do not require pre-market marketing authorisation. Instead, before first sale in Vietnam the responsible party notifies the competent authority and, on receipt, obtains a number (số tiếp nhận phiếu công bố sản phẩm mỹ phẩm) that must appear on the label and in customs documents. Notification is faster and lighter than the drug MA regime — measured in weeks rather than months — but the substantive obligations on ingredient composition, labelling, claims, adverse-event reporting and post-market surveillance are not lighter. They are the substance of the regime.
The competent authority is the Drug Administration of Vietnam (Cục Quản lý Dược — DAV) Cosmetics Division for most cases, with the provincial Department of Health (Sở Y tế) handling domestically manufactured cosmetics under Circular 06/2011/TT-BYT as amended. The legal basis is Circular 06/2011/TT-BYT (national implementation of the ASEAN Cosmetic Directive), amended by Circular 34/2025/TT-BYT (effective 18 August 2025), together with Decree 117/2020/NĐ-CP on administrative sanctions and Decree 38/2021/NĐ-CP on advertising penalties.
Who may hold the notification:
- A Vietnamese-registered legal entity — either the foreign brand's wholly owned subsidiary, or a Vietnamese distributor or partner acting as the Local Responsible Company (Doanh nghiệp chịu trách nhiệm đưa sản phẩm ra thị trường tại Việt Nam).
- The foreign manufacturer directly — only if it has a registered Vietnam representative office. A bare distribution agreement is not enough; the Vietnamese counter-party must be a substantive legal entity capable of bearing post-market obligations.
- The notification number is issued to a specific responsible party. If that party changes — for example the foreign brand switches distributors — a new notification is required. This is the single most common source of friction when a brand transitions from an initial launch distributor to a growth-stage partner.
How to read this page: The comparison table below summarises the timeline, cost, and complexity of the four common cosmetic-entry pathways. "Recent updates" walks through the six substantive changes under Circular 34/2025 and what they mean for a first-time entrant. "Key documents" is the authoritative legal stack. "Resources & links" gives the operational portals a local partner will actually log into. The FAQ closes with the seven questions that come up most frequently in initial planning conversations.
Key documents
Primary legal instruments:
- Circular 06/2011/TT-BYT — Vietnamese national implementation of the ASEAN Cosmetic Directive; the operative rulebook for cosmetic notification, ingredient annexes, and labelling. Sets the notification workflow, the annex structure (Annex II prohibited substances, Annex III restricted substances, Annex IV colorants, Annex V preservatives, Annex VI UV filters), and the responsibilities of the Local Responsible Company.
- Circular 34/2025/TT-BYT — issued 4 July 2025, effective 18 August 2025; amends and supplements Circular 06/2011/TT-BYT. Introduces revised annex formats, updated Product Information File (PIF) requirements, and clarified enforcement procedures.
- ASEAN Cosmetic Directive (ACD) — the regional harmonised framework that Circular 06/2011 transposes into Vietnamese law; the substantive definitions of "cosmetic", the notification form, and the ingredient annexes come from the ACD.
- Decree 117/2020/NĐ-CP — administrative sanctions in the health sector; sets the fine schedule for cosmetic-notification violations, including undeclared ingredients, false claims, and failure to notify before market launch.
- Decree 38/2021/NĐ-CP — advertising sanctions; applies to cosmetic advertising claims that exceed what the notification supports (see /cosmetic/product-claims/).
- Decree 43/2017/NĐ-CP as consolidated by Decree 111/2021/NĐ-CP (Nghị định hợp nhất) — labelling requirements applicable to cosmetics sold in Vietnam; Vietnamese-language mandatory label content, ingredient list format, importer information.
Related Medibase pages:
- Cosmetic notification workflow — /cosmetic/product-notification/
- Cosmetic labelling — /cosmetic/labelling/
- Cosmetic ingredient safety — /cosmetic/ingredient-safety/
- Cosmetic product claims — /cosmetic/product-claims/
- ASEAN Cosmetic Notification template — /templates/cosmetic-notification/
- Cosmetic Product Information File template — /templates/cosmetic-pif/
Recent updates
This section walks through the four common market-entry pathways side by side, then covers what changed under Circular 34/2025 (in force 18 August 2025), then closes with the six frequent rejection reasons a first-time entrant should proof against before submission.
| Pathway | Who holds the notification | Time to notification number | State fee (VND) | Foreign-company control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wholly owned Vietnamese subsidiary (FIE) | The subsidiary itself, as Local Responsible Company | 3–5 business days after subsidiary set-up (~6 months) | 500,000/product (Circular 41/2023/TT-BTC; 50% reduction to 250,000 through 2026-12-31 under TT 64/2025/TT-BTC) | Full — the foreign brand controls every touchpoint |
| Vietnamese distributor as Local Responsible Company | The distributor | 3–5 business days (distributor already exists) | Same fee schedule | Partial — distributor holds the number; switching distributors requires re-notification |
| Registered representative office of the foreign manufacturer | The foreign manufacturer, via the representative office | 3–5 business days (representative office already registered) | Same fee schedule | Full, but representative office cannot itself distribute — a separate distributor still required |
| Cross-border e-commerce (Shopee, TikTok Shop, Lazada) | Platform-appointed importer of record (varies by platform) | Platform onboarding period, typically 4–8 weeks | Fee absorbed into platform commission structure | Minimal — brand does not control notification content directly |
What changed under Circular 34/2025/TT-BYT (in force 18 August 2025):
- Product Information File (PIF) format revised: the ASEAN CPNP-aligned PIF sections were re-numbered and expanded, with new sub-sections on nano-material declaration, allergen listing per ISO 22715, and preservative-efficacy test method identification. Existing PIFs remain valid but must be brought to the new format at the next material update or five-year refresh.
- Annex III restricted-substance list synchronised with the ACD 2025 update — several substances tightened, one delisted. Registrants using formulations at the previous maximum concentration should re-check the Ingredient & Substance Checker at /tools/?tab=ingredient.
- Adverse-event reporting timelines aligned with the ACD Post-Marketing Alert System (PMAS): serious adverse events (SAE) reported within 15 calendar days of first knowledge; non-serious events on the annual PSUR.
- Advertising claims that go beyond the notified product benefits now trigger a mandatory advance-approval requirement — previously the enforcement was ex-post via Decree 38/2021 sanctions. Practical effect: the notification and the advertising script must align before launch.
- Online-notification portal enhancements: the DAV cosmetic portal now accepts electronic signatures under Law 20/2023/QH15 (in force 1 July 2024), reducing the wet-signature burden.
- Clarified role of the provincial Sở Y tế for domestic manufacturers — imported cosmetics remain routed through DAV headquarters.
Six frequent rejection reasons — proof against these before submission:
- Ingredient not on any approved ASEAN annex and not in the Annex II prohibited list: this triggers a "confirm intended use and function" query that adds two to three weeks. Pre-screen the full INCI list against Annex II/III/IV/V/VI via the Ingredient & Substance Checker.
- Vietnamese-language label content missing or non-compliant: the supplementary label must carry the required Vietnamese-language content per Decree 43/2017 consolidated. Products imported for retail must have this in place at customs, not applied post-import.
- Local Responsible Company address does not match the business licence: the address on the notification form must exactly match the business registration certificate. A subsequent address change requires an updated notification.
- Claims not supported by the PIF: any claim (whitening, anti-ageing, sensitive-skin, dermatologist-tested) must have supporting evidence in the PIF Section 8 (safety assessment) or Section 9 (efficacy).
- CFS from a non-ACD country not legalised: Vietnam accepts Certificates of Free Sale from any country, but non-ASEAN CFSs must be consularised (or Apostilled, from 11 September 2026 for Hague signatories) before submission.
- Missing GMP certificate for the manufacturing site: cosmetics must be manufactured under ASEAN Cosmetic GMP or equivalent (ISO 22716). The GMP certificate must be current at the time of notification and referenced in the PIF Section 3 (manufacturing).
Resources & links
Content coming soon.
Frequently asked questions
- Does Vietnam require pre-market marketing authorisation for cosmetics?
No. Vietnam operates the ASEAN Cosmetic Notification (ACN) framework — before first sale, the responsible party notifies DAV (or the provincial Sở Y tế for domestically manufactured cosmetics) and receives a notification number (số tiếp nhận phiếu công bố sản phẩm mỹ phẩm). This is faster than the drug MA regime but the substantive obligations on ingredients, labelling, claims and post-market surveillance are not lighter.
- Can a foreign cosmetic company file the notification directly, without a Vietnamese entity?
Not in most cases. The notification must be held by a Vietnamese-registered legal entity — either the foreign brand's Vietnamese subsidiary (FIE), a Vietnamese distributor acting as Local Responsible Company (Doanh nghiệp chịu trách nhiệm), or a registered Vietnam representative office of the foreign manufacturer. Direct filing from a non-Vietnamese entity is not accepted.
- How long does the notification take?
Three to five business days from a compliant submission, provided the DAV cosmetic portal returns no query. Common queries (ingredient clarification, label content, CFS legalisation) add two to three weeks per round. Plan for four to six weeks end-to-end for a first-time submission.
- What are the state fees?
500,000 VND per product notification (Circular 41/2023/TT-BTC). Circular 64/2025/TT-BTC reduces this by 50% (to 250,000 VND per product) through 31 December 2026. Amendments and re-notifications on address or Local Responsible Company change are charged the same. These are state fees only — private-market costs (translation, notarisation, consular legalisation or Apostille, local partner retainer) typically exceed the state fee by an order of magnitude.
- What is the Product Information File (PIF), and does Medibase provide one?
The PIF is the substantive dossier held by the Local Responsible Company — nine sections covering product identity, quality, safety and efficacy per ASEAN CPNP structure. Medibase provides a PIF template at /templates/cosmetic-pif/ and detailed section-by-section commentary at /cosmetic/product-information-file/ (in preparation as of this page's publication).
- Does Medibase file cosmetic notifications on behalf of foreign companies?
No. Medibase is a Regulatory Technology (RegTech) reference and tools platform, not a registration-services agency. Medibase does not act as a Local Responsible Company, does not file notifications on behalf of a brand, and does not act as a legal representative in Vietnam. If you need a Local Responsible Company, contract a Vietnamese-registered legal entity — a distributor, a specialised regulatory-affairs firm, or set up a Vietnamese subsidiary. Medibase's tools (Ingredient & Substance Checker, Regulatory Impact Simulator) accelerate the diagnostic and planning stages that precede that engagement.
- What are the boundaries with drug regulation?
A product is a cosmetic if its declared function is confined to cleansing, protecting, perfuming, changing the appearance of, or keeping the body in good condition — per Article 2 of Circular 06/2011. If the product makes therapeutic claims (treat, cure, prevent disease) or contains active pharmaceutical ingredients above cosmetic thresholds, it is a drug and requires marketing authorisation under Circular 12/2025/TT-BYT (or from 1 October 2026, Circular 32/2026/TT-BYT). The classification is substantive, not administrative — mis-labelling a drug as a cosmetic triggers Decree 117/2020 sanctions.
- Page updated:
- 2026-08-16