Cosmetic Notification Registration Process in Vietnam
End-to-end operational analysis of the Phiếu công bố sản phẩm mỹ phẩm workflow under Circular 06/2011/TT-BYT, transposing the ASEAN Cosmetic Directive — DAV/DOH split, National Single Window (VNSW) submission, dossier contents, Product Information File (PIF) maintenance, statutory and real-world timelines, renewal and post-notification changes.
Overview
Cosmetic products in Vietnam are subject to a pre-market notification regime — not a marketing authorisation. The instrument is the 化粧品届出書 (Phiếu công bố sản phẩm mỹ phẩm), and the number it carries (Số tiếp nhận Phiếu công bố) is what allows the product to be sold, advertised, or imported. Vietnam is one of ten ASEAN member states implementing the ASEAN Cosmetic Directive (ACD, 2003); Vietnamese cosmetic regulation is therefore harmonised — but not identical — to the regimes in Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines.
A pre-existing topical overview at /cosmetic/product-notification/ describes what the notification is, who must file, what number is issued, and what validity it carries. This page is the operational companion: it walks the workflow step by step, with dossier contents, agency timelines, the mechanics of the National Single Window (VNSW), the PIF audit-readiness drill, and the practical pitfalls that account for most rejection rounds.
Scope of this page:
- Who can file and which authority receives the dossier (imported → DAV; domestic → provincial Sở Y tế).
- The full step-by-step process from substance-screening through completeness review to issuance of the number.
- Statutory 3-working-day window vs the real-world experience in 2024–2026, including the DAV question-cure cycle.
- PIF preparation under the ASEAN PIF Guidelines (four parts: administrative, quality, safety, efficacy) and the 72-hour rule for inspector access.
- Post-notification: renewal at the 5-year mark, change-of-formula triggers, change-of-responsible-company triggers, and the DAV substance-update channel.
- Practical pitfalls: claim language, Annex II substances, safety-assessor signature, missing PIF audit trail, and cross-border e-commerce enforcement.
How to read this page: The overview below sets the operational frame. "Key documents" lists the legal stack and ASEAN annexes in consultation order. "Recent updates" tracks the substance-control changes DAV has transposed via official letters and the enforcement posture on cross-border platforms. "Resources & links" gives the portals used for filing and lookup. The FAQ answers the most common sponsor questions.
Validity, renewal, and lifecycle:
- A notification number is valid for 5 years from the date of issue. Renewal is a fresh filing — there is no abbreviated renewal procedure under Circular 06/2011.
- Substantive changes (formula change, brand-name change, manufacturer change, responsible-company change) trigger a re-notification. Minor changes (e.g., packaging colour) typically do not.
- Validity is product-by-product. One notification → one number → one product identity (single brand + variant + shade family); shade extensions within a colour cosmetics line can be grouped on a single notification under the ACD shade-extension rule.
- The responsible company bears legal liability for safety; the PIF must be available within 72 hours of an inspector request.
Key documents
Cosmetic-specific framework:
- Circular 06/2011/TT-BYT — the "ACD Circular"; transposes the ASEAN Cosmetic Directive into Vietnamese law. Chapters cover notification procedure, label content, ingredient annexes, and post-market obligations. Effective from 1 April 2011 and still the operative instrument for cosmetic regulation in Vietnam.
- ASEAN Cosmetic Directive (ACD, 2003) — the regional harmonisation instrument. Annexes I (banned), II (restricted), III (permitted colourants), IV (permitted preservatives), VI (permitted UV filters) are transposed into Vietnamese law via Circular 06/2011 and updated through DAV official letters (công văn) following ASEAN Cosmetic Scientific Body (ACSB) decisions.
- ASEAN PIF Guidelines — define the structure and content of the Product Information File the responsible company must maintain; the four-part structure (administrative, quality, safety, efficacy) is the operative reference for inspector requests.
General goods labelling:
- Decree 43/2017/NĐ-CP — labelling of goods, general framework; mandatory Vietnamese language; required commercial information.
- Decree 111/2021/NĐ-CP — amends Decree 43 on labelling.
Online filing and single-window:
- Decision 15/2017/QĐ-TTg — implements the National Single Window (VNSW); since 2017 the channel for cosmetic notification of imported goods. DAV connection is part of the second-wave VNSW expansion.
- Decree 85/2019/NĐ-CP — administrative procedures relating to imports through the National Single Window.
Advertising and enforcement:
- Law on Advertising No. 16/2012/QH13 — general framework for advertising; Article 7 lists prohibited claim categories relevant to cosmetics (medicinal claims).
- Decree 38/2021/NĐ-CP — administrative penalties for advertising and labelling violations; foundation for the joint-liability theory now applied to cross-border e-commerce platforms.
Substance-specific transpositions (selection — see DAV website for the current list):
- DAV official letters transposing ASEAN Cosmetic Committee (ACC) decisions: MI / MCI ban in leave-on products, isopropyl- and isobutylparaben ban, Lilial (Butylphenyl methylpropional) ban, Hydroxyethoxyphenyl Butanone (HEPB) permitted as preservative under Annex IV. The full list is maintained on the DAV website.
Note on numbering: Circular, Decree, and Decision numbers and effective dates should be verified against the DAV portal or the Official Gazette (Công báo) before relying on them for a notification.
Recent updates
This section walks through the cosmetic-notification workflow end-to-end, then surveys the substance-update channel and the enforcement posture against cross-border platforms.
1) Choosing the right authority and channel:
- Imported cosmetics — filed at DAV via the National Single Window (vnsw.gov.vn). The responsible company must be a Vietnamese legal entity; foreign brand owners must work through a Vietnamese distributor or set up a Vietnamese legal entity authorised to hold the notification.
- Domestically manufactured cosmetics — filed at the provincial Sở Y tế where the manufacturer is located. Many DOHs (notably Hà Nội and HCMC) operate online portals; smaller provinces still accept paper-and-disc submissions.
2) Step-by-step process — imported cosmetic via VNSW:
- Step 0 — Pre-submission. Confirm the brand is identified consistently across the certificate of free sale (CFS), the manufacturer GMP / ISO 22716 documentation, the formula breakdown, and the proposed Vietnamese-language label. Confirm that no Annex II substance is used without the required restriction conditions, and that no Annex I substance is present at any level. Run a claim-substantiation check against the ASEAN Cosmetic Claim Guidelines — medicinal claims (anti-acne, whitening with bleach, anti-aging beyond superficial appearance) drift into pharmaceutical territory and will be rejected.
- Step 1 — Online submission via the National Single Window (vnsw.gov.vn). The dossier is filed against the DAV process code; the system mirrors the application status across the DAV dossier-tracking interface.
- Step 2 — Mandatory dossier contents: (i) the Phiếu công bố form, signed by the responsible company's legal representative; (ii) a Letter of Authorisation (LoA) from the brand owner to the Vietnamese responsible company, consularised when the issuing country is not an Apostille party recognised by Vietnam; (iii) Certificate of Free Sale (CFS) from the country of origin, consularised under the same rule; (iv) the full formula breakdown showing each ingredient with its INCI name and percentage range; (v) the proposed Vietnamese-language label; (vi) the business registration of the responsible company.
- Step 3 — Completeness review by DAV. Statutory 3 working days; if no objection is raised, the number is issued.
- Step 4 — Substantive review (where triggered). If the completeness reviewer flags substance, labelling, or claim issues, a question round is issued; the applicant cures within the period in the request. Two rounds is typical; three signals risk of refusal.
- Step 5 — Number issuance. Format: NN/YY/CBMP-QLD where NN is the sequence and YY the year. The number is published on the DAV register.
- Step 6 — Build and lodge the PIF. The Product Information File must be ready before circulation begins, not after — inspectors can request it from the moment the product is on the market.
3) Step-by-step process — domestically manufactured cosmetic via provincial DOH:
- Substantively the same dossier, except (i) no CFS or LoA is required (the manufacturer is the responsible company by default), and (ii) the manufacturer must hold a current Cosmetic GMP certificate (CGMP — ISO 22716 or ASEAN Cosmetic GMP equivalent) issued by DAV.
- Number format: NN/YY/CBMP-{province code}. Provincial DOHs publish the issued numbers on their own portals.
4) Statutory timelines vs reality (the practice gap):
- On paper (Circular 06/2011): 3 working days for the completeness window; the number is issued by silence if no objection is raised.
- In practice: imported cosmetics filed cleanly at DAV often do receive the number within the statutory window, but dossiers that draw a question round routinely take 30–90 days end-to-end. Domestic dossiers at provincial DOHs fluctuate more — Hà Nội and HCMC are the fastest; some smaller provinces drift to 45+ days.
5) The PIF — what must be ready before the product moves:
- Part I — Administrative: identity of the responsible company, brand owner, manufacturer; LoA; CFS; copy of the notification.
- Part II — Quality: manufacturing-process description, in-process and finished-product specifications, stability data, GMP documentation, packaging-component specifications.
- Part III — Safety: Cosmetic Product Safety Report under the ASEAN safety assessment scheme — signed by a qualified safety assessor (toxicologist, pharmacist, or equivalent professional); ingredient toxicological profiles; exposure assessment; safety conclusion.
- Part IV — Efficacy: substantiation for each claim that appears on the label, in advertising, or on the product's website.
- 72-hour rule: when DAV or a provincial Sở Y tế requests the PIF, the responsible company has 72 hours to produce the relevant part.
6) Substance-update channel — how DAV transposes ACSB and ACC decisions:
- The ASEAN Cosmetic Scientific Body (ACSB) and the ASEAN Cosmetic Committee (ACC) meet biannually. Decisions to amend the ACD annexes (ban a substance, restrict its use, add a permitted UV filter) flow into Vietnamese law via DAV official letters (công văn) rather than through new circulars.
- Recent transpositions: MI / MCI prohibition in leave-on products; isopropylparaben and isobutylparaben prohibition; Lilial (Butylphenyl methylpropional) prohibition; HEPB permitted as preservative.
- Practical impact: a product notified under the old substance regime becomes non-compliant on the effective date of the transposing official letter. Reformulation and re-notification become mandatory; continued sale exposes the product to recall.
7) Enforcement posture — cross-border e-commerce and therapeutic-claim drift:
- DAV has issued an increasing number of public market-surveillance warnings against cross-border platform listings of cosmetics making therapeutic claims — particularly skin-whitening, anti-acne, and anti-aging products that cross into pharmacological territory and that lack a notification.
- Cross-border platforms (Shopee Global, Lazada Cross-Border, TikTok Shop international) are now operationally responsible for verifying seller documents and removing non-compliant listings; joint liability flows from Decree 38/2021/NĐ-CP.
- Common failed-notification triggers in 2024–2026: incomplete PIF documentation, ingredient declarations that inadvertently include Annex II substances, missing safety-assessor signature, claims that breach the ACD claim guidelines, and brand-name overlap with registered drug products.
8) Practical pitfalls (where most rejection cycles come from):
- Claim language: "anti-aging" is fine in the cosmetic sense; "anti-wrinkle treatment" or "regenerates skin cells" drifts into therapeutic territory. The ACD Claim Guidelines are the binding reference; rephrase before submission, not after rejection.
- Annex II substances without restriction conditions: most common with preservatives near their maximum limits and with UV filters used outside their permitted concentration envelope. Cross-check the current Annex IV / VI before finalising the formula.
- Safety-assessor signature: the Cosmetic Product Safety Report must be signed by an individual with documented qualifications. A QC manager or regulatory affairs officer without toxicology background does not qualify.
- Brand-name overlap: a brand name that overlaps with a registered drug or medical device (or implies a therapeutic use) will draw a substantive question. Check the DAV register before locking the brand for Vietnam.
- PIF audit-readiness: the responsible company must hold the PIF; "the brand owner has it overseas" is not an acceptable answer to a Sở Y tế or DAV inspector.
- Number-format errors: imported cosmetics receive NN/YY/CBMP-QLD (DAV); domestic receive NN/YY/CBMP-{province code}. Listings on retail or e-commerce that show the wrong format format expose the seller to enforcement attention.
Resources & links
Operational portals (for submission and lookup):
- National Single Window (VNSW) — https://vnsw.gov.vn — primary channel for cosmetic notification of imported products.
- Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV) — https://dav.gov.vn — authority for imported-cosmetic notifications and the substance-update channel (công văn).
- DAV public services portal — https://dichvucong.dav.gov.vn — sister portal for tracking and supplementary submissions.
- Hà Nội Department of Health — https://soyte.hanoi.gov.vn — provincial portal for domestic-cosmetic notifications in the Hanoi region.
- HCMC Department of Health — https://medinet.hochiminhcity.gov.vn — provincial portal for domestic-cosmetic notifications in HCMC and the surrounding region.
Government and primary legal sources:
- Ministry of Health (MOH) — https://moh.gov.vn — ministerial decisions, circular drafts in public consultation.
- Official Gazette (Công báo) — https://congbao.chinhphu.vn — authoritative publication of laws, decrees, and circulars cited on this page.
- National legal database — https://vbpl.vn — Circular 06/2011/TT-BYT full text and consolidated cross-references.
ASEAN reference:
- ASEAN Secretariat — Cosmetic Committee resources, including the ACD text, PIF guidelines, claim guidelines, and harmonised annex updates from ACSB and ACC.
- ASEAN Cosmetic Scientific Body (ACSB) — scientific basis for annex updates.
- ASEAN Cosmetic Committee (ACC) — regulatory decision body.
Industry associations and policy dialogue:
- Vietnam Cosmetic Association (CASE) — domestic cosmetic industry voice; participates in DAV substance-update consultations.
- EuroCham Vietnam — cosmetic working subgroup; annual White Book covers cross-border-platform enforcement issues.
- AmCham Vietnam — US cosmetic industry positions.
Medibase internal cross-references:
- /cosmetic/product-notification/ — the topical overview companion to this operational page.
- /cosmetic/ingredient-safety/ — substance annexes (I, II, III, IV, VI) and their Vietnamese transposition; required to screen the formula before submission.
- /cosmetic/product-claims/ — claim language under the ASEAN Cosmetic Claim Guidelines and the cosmetic/drug borderline; required to screen claims before submission.
- /cosmetic/labelling/ — Vietnamese-language label requirements that the dossier label must satisfy.
Frequently asked questions
- 2026 年時点で、ベトナムの化粧品届出は実際にどの程度の期間がかかるか?
通達 06/2011 の法定窓口は完備性審査 3 営業日。異議が出なければ番号は黙示的に発行される。実態としては、VNSW を通じて DAV にクリーンに提出された輸入化粧品は多くの場合この期間内に番号を取得する。補正要求を引いた申請は全体で 30〜90 日かかることが多い。大規模な省・市 Sở Y tế(ハノイ、ホーチミン)の国内申請が最速、一部の小規模な省は 45 日以上にずれ込む。
- 外国ブランドオーナーはベトナム法人が必要か?
構造上必要。化粧品届出書 の責任企業はベトナム法人でなければならない。ブランドオーナーはベトナム法人に授権書を発行し、ベトナム法人が届出を保有し、法的責任を負う。販売契約だけでは不足 — 卸は輸入と流通はできるが、届出の責任企業にはなれない。
- どこに提出するか — DAV か 省・市 Sở Y tế か?
輸入化粧品は VNSW 経由で DAV に提出。国内製造化粧品は製造拠点所在地の省・市 Sở Y tế に提出。同一ブランドが輸入 SKU と国内製造 SKU の双方を持つ場合、輸入 SKU は DAV、国内 SKU は該当する Sở Y tế に — それぞれ別々に提出する。
- PIF とは何か、72 時間ルールはどの程度厳格か?
製品情報ファイルは、各届出済み製品について責任企業が常時保持する書類セット: 管理(第 I 部)、品質(第 II 部)、安全性(第 III 部、有資格の安全性評価者が署名した化粧品安全性報告書を含む)、有効性(第 IV 部)。72 時間ルールは厳格なルール: DAV または 省・市 Sở Y tế 検査官が PIF を要請した場合、責任企業は該当部を 72 時間以内に提示しなければならない。「ブランドオーナーが海外で保持している」は許容回答ではない。
- 変更後はいつ再届出が必要か?
重要な変更は再届出の引き金: 処方変更、ブランド名変更、製造業者変更、責任企業変更、剤形変更。軽微な変更 — 例えば同じ一次包装規格を持つ異なる包装色 — は通常引き金にならないが、PIF に記録すべきである。
- 5 年で届出が満了 — 更新はどうするか?
通達 06/2011 には短縮更新手続はない。更新は新規届出に相当: 完全な 化粧品届出書、有効期間内の新たな CFS、現行 LoA。製品が市場から退出しないよう、満了の 4〜6 か月前に更新書類の準備を開始することを計画する。
- シンガポールやタイの届出に依拠してベトナム手続を短縮できるか?
できない。ASEAN 諸国間で届出番号を相互承認する ACD 全体の仕組みはない。各加盟国が独自の届出登録簿を維持する。調和は物質附属書、申請構造、PIF のレベルにあり、発行された番号自体のレベルにはない。シンガポール申請の 95% を再利用する場合でも、別途ベトナム申請が必要となる。
- 2024–2026 年に越境 EC プラットフォームに関して何が変わったか?
政令 38/2021/NĐ-CP とその後の取締り指針により、越境プラットフォーム(Shopee Global、Lazada Cross-Border、TikTok Shop international)は出品者書類確認と非適合リスティング削除に運用上の責任を負うことになった。有効なベトナム届出番号のない化粧品のリスティング — 特に医薬的効能を表示するもの — は出品者とプラットフォームの双方を行政罰のリスクに晒す。DAV は特定のブランドと出品者を名指す市販監視警告を定期的に公表する。
Last updated: 2026-05-19